Life Stories #18: Sonia Taitz

Life Stories #18: Sonia Taitz
photo: H&H Photographers

In this episode of Life Stories, the podcast where I interview memoir writers about their lives and the art of writing memoir, I chat with Sonia Taitz about The Watchmaker’s Daughter, in which she begins by talking about growing up in New York City as the daughter of two Holocaust survivors. Her relationship with her parents takes up most of the conversation, as you might expect, but we also get into how she was diverted from her literary ambitions into law school—and how she found her way back. I also found out about the novel she’s just finished writing, based on the public downward spiral of one of Hollywood’s biggest stars.

Listen to Life Stories #18: Sonia Taitz (MP3 file); or download the file by right-clicking (Mac users, option-click).

As we near the end of 2012, I just wanted to take a moment to say that I’m really delighted by how Life Stories has turned out so far, and I’m looking forward to improving my game and producing even more episodes next year. If you’re new to the podcast, I encourage you to explore the earlier interviews: Tim Anderson, Cris Beam, Sandra Beasley, Susannah Cahalan, Kambri Crews, Heather Donahue, Alyssa Harad, Storm Large, Jenny Lawson, Gideon Lewis-Kraus, Gary Marcus, Steven Rinella, Rachel Shukert & Rev Jen, Daniel Smith, Cheryl Strayed, Anthony Swofford, and Alex Witchel & Will Schwalbe.

Thanks to everyone who’s been a guest so far, and the publicists who’ve helped make these interviews possible—and to you for listening to (and, I hope, enjoying) them!

28 December 2012 | life stories |

Amazon’s Deleting Customer Reviews: So?

The New York Times had a story about’s purge of thousands of customer reviews from its website. Apparently, an author’s relatives lack the disinterest necessary for a valid evaluation of a book—but Amazon also doesn’t like to see authors reviewing books by their competitors. At least, that’s the way it seems; the actual process of removing reviews has been handled so nebulously that there’s understandable confusion and frustration about the whole thing.

Here’s the thing, though: People have been giving Amazon their book reviews for nothing. Why are they now so surprised that Amazon treats those reviews as worthless and disposable?

I’m not particularly invested in this subject—the only customer review I can remember writing for Amazon was back when I was still on staff, and a negative review I wrote was rejected as not fitting into the promotional campaign in which the book was included, but I didn’t feel like letting all my work go to nothing, so I put it up myself. Other than that, John Scalzi wrote a post recently that sums up my general feeling about providing content for large corporate websites: “Fuck you. Pay me.” Now, it’s true that Amazon doesn’t actually ask people to write for them for free; instead, people have been volunteering to share their opinions for more than a decade. Why? Because they like to share their opinions? Because they like the validation of having other people say their opinions are smart or helpful? Because they like pissing on the aspirations of creative people?

Those are three reasons; there are others. And, truth be told, those are also three of the reasons that people launch their own websites—sites like Beatrice—and freely share their opinions about books and writers. The difference is that here at Beatrice, I can share what I share, reaping all the non-economic benefits of my sharing (as well as some indirect economic benefits), and I don’t have to worry about somebody else deciding to cut me off because they aren’t getting enough out of what I do.

Look, I’m not a purist in these matters; granted, it’s been a year since I last updated my Goodreads, but that’s mostly because I’ve been too busy, not because I stopped believing in the site. I know Goodreads is making money selling ads next to our reviews and discussions, but I’ve found it useful enough to have the literary opinions of a group of people I trust bundled together that I don’t begrudge the company the revenue that makes such a bundling possible.

At Goodreads, though, it feels like (at least to me) there’s an equal emphasis on discovering people as well as discovering books. Even with the sideshow hoopla of customer review rankings, Amazon’s never felt to me like it cares much whether I find someone with a literary sensibility I trust—the customer reviews serve one purpose, and that’s to persuade me to buy books. (Even negative reviews, which ultimately encourage you to keep looking until you find a book you will like.) To me, Amazon customer reviews are noise, and the opinions of my friends on Goodreads are signal. So I honestly can’t get too worked up about Amazon deleting any number of its customer reviews, because I never really considered them worth anything, either.

24 December 2012 | theory |

Next Page »