What I’ve Been Reading Lately

Here’s a few of the literary essays that have crossed my path in recent days:

• James Parker fills Boston Globe readers in on a significant trend in British fantasy, wondering if American readers and filmgoers are rediscovering JRR Tolkien and CS Lewis as comfort in times of war, then connects Watership Down to The Jungle Book, only to pivot and suggest the power of Watership comes not from its pastorality but from its violence.

• Doug Seibold’s latest commentary for The Book Standard takes on the pernicious influence of bullcrit&#8212″what you produce when you feel the need to give the impression that you’ve read a book or seen a film or heard a band that you haven’t, though you’ve read or heard someone else’s opinion about it, and you either rip off that opinion or tweak it to whatever degree the situation requires of you at the time.” With so many books out there, he says, any meeting between a sales rep and a book buyer is bound to be full of it.

• Jennifer Howard’s Chronicle of Higher Education article about scribbling in the margins considers the academic import of those sidenotes, especially when they come from famous readers like Coleridge. Who knew that all those !s and !!s I’d been leaving in my review galleys might actually be appreciated by future generations?

Finally, an article I didn’t read—but only because I’d written it. For those who might have been curious about last month’s overview of the New Age market, but don’t have subscriptions to Publishers Weekly, the producers of What the Bleep Do We Know have put the article up for free viewing.

19 October 2005 | uncategorized |