The Beatrice Interview


Three In Love

Barbara Foster, Michael Foster, and Letha Hadady


interviewed by Ron Hogan


Three In Love is a historical overview of the menage à trois from ancient to modern times, but it's also a series of glimpses into the lives of its three authors, Barbara Foster, Michael Foster, and Letha Hadady, who have been involved in a threesome of their own for several years. As with any thriving subculture, the book came about in part because the authors wanted to find -- or make, if necessary -- accurate reflections of their experiences in the culture. The result is a compelling mixture of romance, sexual politics, and history, examining the impact of three-way relationships on politics, literature, and the arts. I spoke with all three authors recently by telephone about the book and their experiences writing -- and living -- it.

RH: What inspired you, after years of living in a menage à trois, to write this overview?

BF: We'd talked about writing a book about our experiences. We had so much going on in our lives, and we'd written other books about subjects less intimately connected to us. Our original intent was to do a book much more about us and less about other threesomes, but once we started the research, we found so many amazing people out there...

MF: One of my inspirations was Vito Russo's The Celluloid Closet, for the way that it showed that images of homosexuality were present throughout film history, even when they were buried or obscured. I wondered if there was something similar going on with menages, and as Barbara says, the data we found in our research began to fall into a pattern. We're in the same position gays were in pre-Stonewall; we exist, but we're not seen. We're observed but we're not identified. I saw a PBS documentary on romantic comedies just a few days ago that never mentioned menage à trois. You'd have thought that romantic comedies were only ever about couples.

RH: In the opening chapter, you discuss how a threesome often has a fourth member -- the observer.

BF: The fourth feels the incredible energy going on among the three and wants to join in.

LH: We've had a number of fourths over the years, and they all tend to be transitory. Three is a number where the members tend to turn inward and stick together like glue, while foursomes tend to split into couples. One of our fourths was my ex-husband. It was like he was doing comparative studies and not really involved emotionally or spiritually in the relationship as we are.

MF: I think the fourth can be salutary at times, but it rarely plays a key energetic part. Its main function is to view the threesome and sometimes to write about it. The connections between each duad in the threesome don't necessarily have to be sexual, but they do have to be close.

RH: You make a strong effort to describe what you see threesomes as not being.

MF: I'd say the one-night stand menage bears the same relationship to threesomes as junk food does to food. But it doesn't always have to be like that. The woman reviewing our book in Nerve talks about how she wanted to go to bed with her roommate, another woman, so she brought in her boyfriend for a threesome. That's obviously about those women being drawn together and using the man as an excuse.

RH: Before you initiated this threesome, had any of you thought about doing this before? How has it worked out for you?

BF: Mike and I had already what's called a tolerant marriage, so it wasn't totally surprising. We'd each had relationships before. But this was a bolt out of the blue because Letha was totally different.

MF: If the relationship lasts over time, I think each person gets to satisfy their needs. Barbara, for example, has always been more of the going-out type than I am. So how do you deal with that over a period of time? Usually, I don't see couples reconcile those kinds of differences, but why the hell shouldn't everybody get to exercise their wants? With the three of us, we can always find a combination that works for us. I don't dance, so sometimes the two women will go out dancing together.

LH: Those of us who grew up as baby boomers were given a big dose of positive images of threesomes. Like Superman -- Lois Lane flies through the air with Superman, which has an obvious erotic charge, and on the ground she's got Clark Kent, who's a very steady marriageable type. She exercises both sides of her psyche, she has it all. It's something we all took for granted. A lot of people have looked for this ideal of plenitude and reached for menages because they want more than the duality of the couple.

RH: But it's a lot of hard work, even when it's a dream come true.

MF: We have plenty of quarrels and disagreements like everybody else. But as we've been out, we've had quite a bit of tension. The literary establishment has fled from us. Radio and TV glommed onto us hoping for sensational stuff that they didn't get. They tried to fit us into slots. Barbara gets flack as the wife with lovers. As the "man with two wives," I inevitably get attacked and insulted by women reporters.

BF: Now that we're out of the closet with the book, we're starting to get people who feel obligated to shun us or to let us know how they feel about our relationship. It's interesting too how often we get attacked by other women. Somehow there's this idea that if you're getting more than you're "supposed to," it's anti-democratic and anti-feminist.

LH: There's been very little crossover between Three in Love and my professional world of alternative medicine. People usually don't want to know about the personal lives of their health professionals, so people don't nudge me in the ribs and say, "Hey, I saw this book." They might have seen it, but they don't want to face me with it.

RH: Any closing comments?

LH: We hope the book will provide examples for people who are trying to broaden their horizons, and there are positive aspects to narcissism in that regard. When you associate yourself, as I have, with people who are extremely talented and seductive and ambitious, you have to learn. You have to stretch. Having that relationship with those people improves you, and that's a form of narcissism as well.

My own experience is that my nature is generous and loving to a fault. When I was married, I was consumed by the relationship. I've become more generous, more gentle to myself. I encourage other people to make their own menage. It's one of the best ways of learning to be compassionate and kind and to produce good work together.

BF: I grew up reading true romance magazines, where you always had your one romance, and I took for granted that would be my karma, and it really has been other. It's been what it is, it's been threeway. That's my path, and I'm not sorry at this point, and I doubt I'll be sorry further down the pike.

MF: I would like people to discover what they really want, whether it's one lover or two or celibacy. Whatever it is, look inside yourself and find it, and pursue it.

BEATRICE Suggested further reading
Susie Bright

All materials copyright © 1997 Ron Hogan