Notably (and Admirably) Paglia-Free Wolf/Bloom Article

Over at Slate, Meghan O'Rourke considers the problems with Naomi Wolf's story (and makes reference to Rachel Donadio's dogged followup of the story she broke last week in the Observer). O'Rourke chastises Wolf for (among other things) trafficking in rumor rather than hard evidence and not speaking to any current Yale women about their experiences with sexual harassment or the university's handling of harassment complaints. Ultimately, she wonders if the article won't do more harm than good for women at Yale and on campuses nationwide:

Wolf's article confuses the issue rather than clarifies it. Her gaps and imprecision give fodder to skeptics who think sexual harassment charges are often just a form of hysteria.